Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
Shop deviantART for the
holidays and save BIG!
Click here! :holly:
[x]

deviantART

 

I found my answer...

Wed Aug 23, 2006, 7:55 PM
Ok.. partially, and it was more thanks to Fovea, but anyway, an answer is an answer. so in all its glory, here it is:

"Art is something, that an individual could not or would not have seen with their own eyes under normal circumstances."

I think that about covers it right (as right as... yeah). So the role of the artist then is to help another see it. Under this definition I'd even say family vacation photos or even porn is art. Its not important what the piece is; its the context. So vacation photos to someone who wasn't there is a creating a new experience which they could not have seen, as is porno to someone who doesn't get enough of his daily fix. and then maybe halu-drugs are art as well, as is torture or a lack of oxygen.

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:icondarknova69:
understand this...i cannot :jedi: :P

--
Wat better place than here? wat better time than NOW?
:iconimmenseinertia:
but dude that is takin it too damn literally... i guess that the answer meant that even if the person is present in the same place as the artist, the artist sees summin that he/she doesn't see hence the term "art" not sight

--
Are you telling me that it isn't flat???
:iconchinque:
thats true... in a way... that an "artist" sees more than anyone else looking at the same thing. but the reason i took it literally is that it makes sense... even if its just metaphorical.
things like those girls pissin on the car... art?
the obvious answer is NO! cumon... its sacriledge and the like
but art has a larger more wider spread definition.
as far as halucination-drugs are concerned. i don't see why if the portrayal of the 'trip' is art (requim, fear and loathing, etc) that the trip itself is not art. the only question then is: who is the artist for a piece of art you experince.. ala gonzo..

--
If women ran the Army, would missiles and submarines be shaped differently?

Journal History

Site Map